The Living Torah<\/i> offers this footnote to “clarify” the matter. Always one to do his “homework” thoroughly, Rabbi Kaplan offers us this dazzling variety of definitions of the term tachash<\/i>, which is listed among the materials necessary for the construction of the Tabernacle near the very beginning of this week’s Torah portion, Terumah<\/i> (Exodus 25:1-27:19):<\/span><\/p>\n “Blue-processed skins\u2014others have ‘black leather;’ that is, leather worked in such a manner as to come out dark and waterproof. Other sources identify tachash <\/i>as a species of animal. Some say that it is the ermine, a member of the weasel family. Others state that it is a member of the badger family… Others say that it is a colorful one-horned animal known as a keresh<\/i>. Some say that this is a species of wild ram, possibly an antelope, okapi, or giraffe. Some see the one-horned creature as the narwhal, which has its left tooth developed into a single long horn-like appendage. This animal, which can grow to be over 16 feet long, is occasionally found on the southern Sinai shores… In Arabic, tukhush<\/i> denotes the sea cow or dugong, an aquatic mammal which is found on the shores of the Sinai. Some say that the tachash <\/i>is a type of seal, since its skins were used for the Tabernacle’s roof, and seal skins are often used for this purpose.”<\/span><\/p>\n Suffice it to say that whatever the true identity of the tachash<\/i>, it was such a multifaceted creature or object that it couldn’t be definitively identified by anyone who hadn’t actually seen it.<\/span><\/p>\n As usual, I find Rashi’s definition most reasonable. Here’s Rashi on the verse in Exodus 25:5 where we first encounter the tachash<\/i>:<\/span><\/p>\n “It was a type of wild animal which only existed for that moment in history. It had many different colors and is, therefore, translated by Targum Onkelos as sasgona, <\/i>a composite of the Hebrew phrase ‘she’sass u’mitpaer b’gavanim shelo,’ ‘which is happy and proud of its many colors.’<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\nIn short, it is a multifaceted creature which rejoices in the range and diversity of its many colors<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\nRashi’s definition, with which I’ve been familiar since my early elementary school years, began to take on a special significance for me as I grew older. I came to know many teachers who were, in a sense, monochromatic. That is, they seem to have only one color to them. The color was often of a strikingly beautiful hue. But it was only one color, something I found limiting<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\nSometimes, in Judaic classes, the \u201ccolor\u201d was scholarly expertise in specific tractates of the Talmud, with ignorance of, or deliberate neglect of, other tractates. Sometimes, in general studies classes, it was an obsession with math and experimental science, often accompanied by scorn for poetry, music, and art.<\/span><\/p>\nEventually, I was fortunate to be blessed with educators who were more colorful and were able to draw from a wider scope of sources and areas of human experience.<\/span><\/p>\nI recall my seventh-grade general studies teacher, Mr. Zeller, who taught us math through baseball statistics and evoked in us an interest in fine literature by reading us tales from William Saroyan’s “My Name is Aram.” He even helped us draw parallels between our secular studies and our religious curriculum<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\nIt was not until college that I was introduced to the writings of the great British philosopher, who had an impressive Jewish yichus<\/i>, Isaiah Berlin.<\/span><\/p>\n He wrote a precious little book entitled The Hedgehog and the Fox<\/i>. The title is drawn from a proverb of the ancient Greek poet, Archilochus, “A fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing.” The hedgehog has one means of defense, his quills. The fox, on the other hand, has countless ways to outsmart his pursuers.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\nIsaiah Berlin expands this distinction to writers and thinkers. He contrasts those whose work focuses upon one single defining idea versus those who draw on a wide variety of areas of knowledge and life experiences. He includes Plato and Dostoyevsky in the former category and Aristotle and Shakespeare in the latter. Note that he makes no claim that either of these writers and thinkers is superior to the other<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\nThroughout my life, I have encountered many great leaders of the Jewish community. Some have been “hedgehogs,” and others have been “foxes.” I have also found that many of my friends are attracted to, and prefer to identify with, those who “know one big thing.”<\/span><\/p>\nMy own tendency is inclined toward those “who know many things.” Some might call me a fan of the “foxes”, but I prefer to be considered a fan of the tachash<\/i>.<\/span><\/p>\n During this past year, the year of the pandemic, we have suffered the loss of many great men and women who have “known one big thing,” known it well, and taught it well. We have also suffered the loss of other men and women who have “known many things,” known them well, and taught them well.<\/span><\/p>\nNot quite two weeks ago, we lost a man who was more than a mentor to me and more than a dear friend. I speak of Rabbi Dr. Abraham Twerski, zecher tzaddik l’vracha<\/i>, a “fox” in the best sense of the metaphor.<\/span><\/p>\n Named for ancestors who were called Avraham Yehoshua<\/i>, and known informally as Reb Shia<\/i>, he was a chasid<\/i> in every sense of that often misused term. He was pious, devout, and meticulously observant of every ritual and every minor custom. He was a chasid<\/i> in his dress, on the Sabbath and festivals and on every day of the week. He knew Hasidic tales and knew how to tell stories in an inimitable fashion and in a manner designed to reach the hearts and souls of every audience he addressed.<\/span><\/p>\n He knew well, better than almost everyone I have known, the “one big thing” that is Hasidisim, Chasidus<\/i><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\nBut he knew so many other things. He attended medical school and received tuition assistance from the famed non-Jewish comedian Danny Thomas. He was trained as a psychiatrist and went on to become a world-renowned expert in the fields of alcoholism and addictive behaviors. He founded one of the most prestigious centers in the world for the treatment of alcoholism. He worked closely with nuns and archbishops of the Roman Catholic faith.<\/span><\/p>\nHis interests were far more colorful, to use the tachash<\/i> analogy, than his faith and profession, although they too had plenty of “color” to them. He was an avid fan of the famous Peanuts<\/i> cartoons and appreciated far more than their humor. He perceived their profound wisdom and eventually collaborated with the cartoonist himself, Charles Shultz.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\nHe was the author of more than sixty books, and although he maintained that they were really all about “one big thing,” namely self-esteem, I insist that they were about “many big things.” I urge the readers of this column to sample but several of his works, and I am certain that you will agree with me.<\/span><\/p>\nThere are many other “big things” that I could enumerate: his generosity, his openness, his authenticity, his friendliness, his ability to get along with his adversaries and often convert them to his side, and, perhaps above all else, his courage to confront the issues of abuse in the Jewish community.<\/span><\/p>\nI close my remarks with one other “big thing,” his soulful musical compositions. How appropriate it was to have been escorted to his final resting place with a song he composed, Hoshea et Amecha.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n How apt is that tune as an antidote for our ubiquitous despondency!<\/span><\/p>\nHow apt are its words: “Deliver Your people, and bless Your heritage. Tend to them and uplift them, forever.<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\nAnd how well do the words for the tachash <\/i>describe the persona of Rabbi Dr. Twerski: \u201cHappy, and proud of his many colors\u201d!<\/span><\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Weinreb_Tzvi.jpg\")