{"id":96215,"date":"2026-10-11T04:38:53","date_gmt":"2026-10-11T09:38:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/?p=96215"},"modified":"2026-10-11T04:38:53","modified_gmt":"2026-10-11T09:38:53","slug":"op-ed-a-satire-about-anne-frank-explains-woke-antisemitism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/op-ed-a-satire-about-anne-frank-explains-woke-antisemitism\/","title":{"rendered":"OP-ED: A satire about Anne Frank explains woke antisemitism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By JONATHAN S. TOBIN<\/p>\n<div class=\"ArticlePage-dateAndSource\">(<em>JNS.org<\/em>) \u2013&nbsp;This is a moment in Jewish history when scholars, journalists, historians, community leaders and ordinary Jews are all seeking to understand what has been happening to them. Since the Hamas-led Palestinian-Arab terror attacks on Israeli communities on Oct. 7, 2023, they\u2019ve witnessed a surge of antisemitism unlike anything American Jews have ever experienced.<\/div>\n<div id=\"attachment_96216\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/slam-frank.webp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-96216\" class=\"wp-image-96216 size-medium lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/slam-frank-300x169.webp\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/slam-frank-300x169.webp 300w, https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/slam-frank-768x432.webp 768w, https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/slam-frank.webp 1000w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 300px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 300\/169;\" \/><noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-96216\" class=\"wp-image-96216 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/slam-frank-300x169.webp\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/slam-frank-300x169.webp 300w, https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/slam-frank-768x432.webp 768w, https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/slam-frank.webp 1000w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/noscript><\/a><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-96216\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Off-Broadway theater in New York City\u2019s East Village where the satirical hip-hop musical \u201cSlam Frank\u201d is being performed. (Photo by Jonathan Tobin)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Their efforts to comprehend this shocking turn of events have led to cogent explanations. These point to toxic ideologies, media bias and a successful propaganda campaign that exploits traditional tropes\u2014as well as modern innovations\u2014of Jew-hatred, aimed at delegitimizing Israel, Jews and Jewish identity in the name of anti-racism.<\/p>\n<p>One way to understand how we got here, and why this turn against the Jews is being committed by people who think of themselves as high-minded human-rights advocates who would never engage in bigotry, is to go to an Off-Broadway theater in New York City\u2019s East Village where the satirical hip-hop musical \u201cSlam Frank\u201d is being shown.<\/p>\n<p>Nothing I have read, heard or seen better exemplifies the erasure of Jewish life that has become ubiquitous in popular culture in the third decade of the 21st century than this minor satire.<\/p>\n<p>The play was first performed in 2025 to mostly glowing reviews in outlets like <span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/10\/24\/theater\/slam-frank-crooked-cross-review.html?eafs_enabled=false#:~:text=%E2%80%9CSlam%20Frank%E2%80%9D%20is%20a%20little,of%20its%20creators'%20good%20faith.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-cms-ai=\"0\"><i>The New York Times<\/i><\/a><\/span> and flattering profiles of its creators, Andrew Fox and Joel Sinesky (who are both Jewish), in <span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/culture\/persons-of-interest\/the-composer-making-a-hip-hop-musical-about-anne-frank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-cms-ai=\"0\"><i>The New Yorker<\/i><\/a><\/span> and <span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/stage\/2026\/sep\/25\/slam-frank-musical-off-broadway\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-cms-ai=\"0\"><i>The Guardian<\/i><\/a><\/span><i>. <\/i>But it\u2019s back for a scheduled two-month run at The Orpheum Theater where, judging by the performance that I attended, it\u2019s winning big laughs and loud applause from a mostly young audience eager to join in the mockery of all that the established culture holds sacred.<\/p>\n<p>And what better way to do that than by a new twist on the story of what Dara Horn aptly observed in her seminal book, <i>People Love Dead Jews<\/i>, as \u201ceveryone\u2019s (second) favorite dead Jew&#8221;\u2014the most favorite dead Jew being the Christian messiah.<\/p>\n<p>As Horn noted, <i>The Diary of Anne Frank<\/i> is the world\u2019s most popular and widely read book about the Holocaust specifically because it does not describe the genocide of the Jews that less popular survivor memoirs, such as those by Elie Wiesel and Primo Levi, did. That\u2019s because the slaughter happens outside of the pages of Anne\u2019s diary, which ends before her family\u2019s capture and the gruesome murder of all of the residents of the famous annex in Amsterdam other than her father, Otto.<\/p>\n<p>It is loved not so much because of the portrait it paints of a brilliant young writer who might have accomplished so much had she been allowed to live. Rather, it is because reading it grants the non-Jewish reader absolution for the mass murder of the Jews.<\/p>\n<p>Readers of the <i>Diary,<\/i> and the millions who have who seen the universalized version of it presented in a hit play and movie first produced in the 1950s, love the fact that those performances ended with Anne\u2019s famous line: \u201cI still believe, in spite of everything, that people are truly good at heart.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As Horn wrote, \u201cIt is far more gratifying to believe that an innocent dead girl has offered us grace than to recognize the obvious: Frank wrote about people being \u201ctruly good at heart\u201d before meeting people who weren\u2019t. Three weeks after writing those words, she met people who weren\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>After Anne had experienced the horrors of Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen, she learned just how evil those who blamed Jews for everything that was wrong with their world could be.<\/p>\n<p>Remarkably, the authors of \u201cSlam Frank\u201d are after something similar to the false grace that those who have read the <i>Diary<\/i> enjoy. Their conceit lies in the work\u2019s presentation: a play within a play performed at a \u201cprogressive\u201d company that treats the audience to an absurd version of the familiar story of a group of Jews who spent years hiding in an attic from the Nazis.<\/p>\n<p>The production begins by taking a swipe at the hypocritical \u201cland acknowledgments\u201d about Native Americans that liberals perform at all sorts of occasions to virtue-signal their woke sympathies. It goes on to poke fun at everything else one can think of.<\/p>\n<p>The authors claim the play was inspired by a particularly clueless social-media post asking if Anne Frank ever acknowledged her \u201cprivilege\u201d as a white European. Of course, as a member of the most persecuted minority in history and someone who was hunted down and murdered by the German Nazis, she had no \u201cprivilege.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><b>An inside joke<\/b><\/p>\n<p>By making fun of everything in our current society, they seem to be offering a form of absolution that enables transcending both fashionable opinion and conventional pieties\u2014both the traditional and woke versions. By laughing along with the send-up not only of the plight of the Frank family, but of all sorts of contemporary cliches about diversity, feminism, gender identity and male chauvinism, they can claim to be innocent of the horrible crimes committed against humanity in the past and not responsible for any bad thing in the present. More than that, it sanctions their sense of themselves as superior to those who cling to identity or history and don\u2019t get the authors\u2019 attempt at an inside joke.<\/p>\n<p>Some Jewish critics have chided those who voiced outrage at the appropriation of the Anne Frank story on the grounds that they\u2019re wrong to think the play is mocking its long dead heroine. Some even claimed it was no more offensive than Mel Brooks\u2019s classic comedy \u201cThe Producers,\u201d whose conceit centered on a failed scam to create a certain theatrical flop\u2014a feel-good musical about the Nazis called \u201cSpringtime for Hitler.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Brooks\u2019s comic masterpiece, which was first conceived at a moment in the 1960s when the notion of theatergoers enjoying a \u201cgay romp at Berchtesgaden\u201d truly was unthinkable, doesn\u2019t hit audiences in quite the same manner today when antisemitism has come out of the closet in which it briefly hid after the Holocaust. But he didn\u2019t mock the victims of the Holocaust, deny them their Jewish identity or claim that half of the Jews living in the world (a figure that still numbers millions fewer than before the murder of the six million) are evil \u201ccolonizers\u201d who are perverting the legacy of those who died.<\/p>\n<p>That is what \u201cSlam Frank\u201d does. And it accomplishes it to the cheers of those who have been hearing similar messages in the mainstream media and at pop concerts. Brooks was making fun of the Nazis as the epitome of evil that had no place in a normal or decent society. \u201cSlam Frank\u201d is less funny as well as dishonest in its claim to be an equal opportunity offender. It mocks the victims of the Nazis, not their murderers.<\/p>\n<p>You can laugh if you like at a show that portrays Anne as a Latina rapper (who flees the \u201cjungles of Germany\u201d at her father\u2019s behest after the American CIA installed Hitler as its dictator); her mother as a black woman who never stops intoning the mantras of diversity; her father as a barely repressed gay man; her sister, Margot, as a neuro-diverse mute\/would-be Zionist fascist oppressor of Arabs; her friend\/first love, Peter, as a gender-confused aspiring dancer; his father as a stereotypical obnoxious white \u201cmansplainer;\u201d and his mother as a repressed \u201cStepford Wife.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>You can nod along to the play\u2019s portrayal of Anne\u2019s family as instructing her to stop speaking and writing in Spanish (her real identity) so as to ensure her book\u2019s future popularity with a white audience along with the other flat jokes that keep the mockery flowing.<\/p>\n<p>And if you\u2019re a theater buff, you can smirk at the numerous allusions to better plays such as \u201cHamilton\u201d (whose famous logo is appropriated, albeit with a yellow star) and many others.<\/p>\n<p>Most will laugh along with this. So, too, will critics who are straining to be part of the inside joke so as to display their virtue by disdaining everything that is satirized. But what they are either deliberately ignoring, or are just too dim to understand, is that the one thing this play is not joking about is denying the Jews their story, humanity and rights.<\/p>\n<p><b>A \u2018secret\u2019 ending<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The producers of the play ask that critics not reveal the ending of the show so as to ensure that audiences fully register the \u201cshock\u201d of some of its denouement. But the secret ending of the play isn\u2019t comparable to the last minutes of Agatha Christie\u2019s \u201cWitness For The Prosecution,\u201d in which the true identity of the murderer and the eponymous witness is revealed. So, I don\u2019t feel obligated to play by their rules.<\/p>\n<p>What those who have lauded the play as \u201cclever, gleefully provocative\u201d or even <span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/BenjBrantley\/status\/1974854532984426530\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-cms-ai=\"0\">\u201cthe most important new show around\u201d<\/a><\/span> aren\u2019t telling you is what happens in the play\u2019s final scenes.<\/p>\n<p>Margot finally speaks, only to give an oration about the need to go to Palestine to displace and oppress its indigenous Arab population once the war ends. Anne then realizes that her family shouldn\u2019t survive and betrays them herself, leading to their deaths. But then, after the bodies fall (they are shot on the spot rather than gassed or tortured and starved in the camps), Hitler turns up and, having shed his male identity and become a trans woman, he \u201ccancels the Holocaust\u2019 so the Jews don\u2019t have to commit suicide to save humanity from the evils of Zionism.<\/p>\n<p>Cue the applause, and the actors all turn up for a final chorus wearing t-shirts with woke slogans, including one reading \u201cby any means necessary,\u201d something that is embraced by those cheering for Hamas\u2019 efforts to slaughter the contemporary living Jews that are not as popular as the dead Anne.<\/p>\n<p>Sure, we\u2019re not supposed to take any of this seriously except to embrace the notion that no one is 100% correct and that all causes are suspect. But the reaction of the audience to the mention of \u201cPalestine\u201d and the cheers that greeted Anne\u2019s claim that the \u201cseven million colonizers\u201d currently committing crimes there are the result of the six million dead Jews told you all you need to know about the impact of this play at this moment.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the hopes of some who lauded the play, and believed it to be a jab at the tweet that inspired it, the audience wasn\u2019t acknowledging that Jews don\u2019t have \u201cwhite privilege.\u201d Rather, they were nodding along at the false claim that Jews have no right to live in Israel. And this is because Jews are now wrongly viewed as \u201cwhite\u201d oppressors.<\/p>\n<p>Contrary to its press clippings, \u201cSlam Frank\u201d is not an equal-opportunity offender. It may be poking fun at most things, but the one thing it is deadly serious about is denying the Jews their stories, as well as the right to mourn their dead with dignity and to live in freedom in their own country without being smeared as monsters and targeted for genocide.<\/p>\n<p><b>Would they do this to another group?<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Moreover, could anyone imagine someone putting on a play today in which black or Hispanic victims of racist crimes were portrayed as Jews or any identity other than their own? Would they deny them their culture and history and use them as stand-ins for more fashionable identities? Of course not.<\/p>\n<p>Such a play, even if it claimed to be a satire, would be denounced as racist. Even the hit musical comedy \u201cThe Book of Mormon\u201d by the creators of the cartoon satire \u201cSouth Park,\u201d to which \u201cSlam Frank\u201d has been compared, is kinder to its targets\u2014the adherents of that faith\u2014than Fox and Sinesky are to the objects of their scorn. But you can do this to Jews with impunity and still be applauded by liberal critics as having accomplished an act of creative genius.<\/p>\n<p>This isn\u2019t the first time the story of Anne Frank has been utilized to advance a non-Jewish agenda. The aforementioned play and movie adaptations of the <i>Diary <\/i>deliberately downplayed the Jewish elements of the story and sought to universalize Anne as a girl just like everyone else. That pleased Anne\u2019s father, Otto, who had little use for Judaism or Jewish identity. It also drove writer Meyer Levin, who had worked to promote the book and wanted to write a more Jewish play, nearly out of his mind.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, just like those adaptations of Anne\u2019s story that came at a time when Jews were eager to fit in and be seen as the same as everyone else, \u201cSlam Frank\u201d speaks just as loudly to the current desire of many, including some Jews, to erase not just Israel but also Jewish peoplehood itself.<\/p>\n<p>The answer to the question as to why antisemitism is flourishing in a way that it hasn\u2019t since the Holocaust is that contemporary Western culture is willing to mock everything but not the lie that Jews, as both Hitler and woke ideologues alike have claimed, are \u201cweaponizing antisemitism.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>While some Jews thought the unspeakable atrocities of Oct. 7 against Jews by a genocidal Islamo-fascist terror group and its supporters would generate sympathy for the victims, the opposite has occurred. The shedding of their blood in the largest mass slaughter of Jews since the Holocaust didn\u2019t shame or deter antisemites; it excited them.<\/p>\n<p>And though the movement to demonize and delegitimize the one Jewish state on the planet had been building toward this for several decades, the explosion of antisemitism shouldn\u2019t have surprised anyone\u2014since, for the chattering classes, the Jews remain a metaphor, rather than a people with rights.<\/p>\n<p><b>A product of this moment in cultural history<\/b><\/p>\n<p>A world in which \u201cSlam Frank\u201d is acclaimed as a work of comic genius is not only one in which nothing sacred to the Jews is granted even minimal respect. It\u2019s one in which people, including New York theater audiences who think of themselves as enlightened liberals, can believe blood libels about Jews committing \u201cgenocide,\u201d and that the war to eradicate the sole Jewish state and to commit another Holocaust against its people is a righteous one.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSlam Frank\u201d seems unlikely to have a long afterlife or hold the stage in the future, and not merely because it isn\u2019t as clever as its admirers think it is. Rather, because it is a product of this particular moment in cultural history.<\/p>\n<p>Since Oct. 7 three years ago, it has once again become permissible to strip Jews of their past and identity and to smear them as \u201ccolonizers\u201d and oppressors. We can only hope that this episode passes quickly, ensuring that this travesty is relegated to the trash heap of theatrical history, where it belongs.<\/p>\n<p><i>Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief of JNS. Follow him: <\/i><span class=\"LinkEnhancement\"><a class=\"Link\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/jonathans_tobin\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-cms-ai=\"0\"><i>@jonathans_tobin.<\/i><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<div style=\"padding-bottom:20px; padding-top:10px;\" class=\"hupso-share-buttons\"><!-- Hupso Share Buttons - https:\/\/www.hupso.com\/share\/ --><a class=\"hupso_toolbar\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hupso.com\/share\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-src=\"https:\/\/static.hupso.com\/share\/buttons\/share-medium.png\" style=\"border:0px; padding-top: 5px; float:left;\" alt=\"Share Button\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==\" class=\"lazyload\" \/><noscript><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/static.hupso.com\/share\/buttons\/share-medium.png\" style=\"border:0px; padding-top: 5px; float:left;\" alt=\"Share Button\"\/><\/noscript><\/a><script type=\"text\/javascript\">var hupso_services_t=new Array(\"Twitter\",\"Facebook\",\"Google Plus\",\"Pinterest\",\"Linkedin\",\"Tumblr\",\"Email\");var hupso_background_t=\"#EAF4FF\";var hupso_border_t=\"#66CCFF\";var hupso_toolbar_size_t=\"medium\";var hupso_image_folder_url = \"\";var hupso_url_t=\"\";var hupso_title_t=\"OP-ED%3A%20A%20satire%20about%20Anne%20Frank%20explains%20woke%20antisemitism\";<\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"https:\/\/static.hupso.com\/share\/js\/share_toolbar.js\"><\/script><!-- Hupso Share Buttons --><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":96216,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,7122],"tags":[14792,11847,8790,8795,8788,10943],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96215"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96215"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":96218,"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96215\/revisions\/96218"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/96216"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.crescentcityjewishnews.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}