Netanyahu admits Israel’s economy reopened ‘too soon’
(JTA) — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu acknowledged that the reopening of the economy amid the coronavirus occurred “too soon”
Facing a surge in COVID-19 cases in recent weeks, Netanyahu took responsibility for the decision to reopen the country a month ago after severe early restrictions were put in place to halt its spread.
“We first went back to work, then we opened stores, malls, schools and restaurants. Lastly, we open event halls, clubs, bars and other places in which there are gatherings and close contact,” Netanyahu said Thursday night, according to a transcript provided by his office. “In retrospect, as part of the trial-and-error, it is possible to say that this last stage was too soon.”
He added: “I take upon myself the responsibility for this step and I also take upon myself the responsibility to fix it. To this end, we have now closed places of social gathering in closed spaces. We will take other steps if necessary.”
Netanyahu’s remarks accompanied the government’s announcement of a new financial aid package to assist workers and businesses impacted by the coronavirus. The measures include an immediate cash infusion of about $2,700 for the self-employed, bimonthly grants of $1,700 to small businesses and up to $144,000 for larger ones, and expanded unemployment benefits.
Anger over the economic fallout from the coronavirus spilled into the streets on Saturday night with a demonstration in Tel Aviv protesting delays in promised public assistance.
Israel had been seen as a success story in battling the virus, with severe lockdown restrictions early in the pandemic keeping confirmed cases and deaths relatively low. But the reopening led to a surge in cases and the reimposition of restrictive measures.
Since the end of June, Israel has seen the number of serious cases double and 18 deaths from the virus.
On Monday, the country announced 1,000 new cases in 24 hours. The following day, the nation’s director of public health resigned, charging that the government was privileging economic concerns over the health of its citizens.